The Appeals Court of Massachusetts recently vacated a judgment totaling almost $65,000,000 on the grounds the alleged unfair and deceptive acts of the defendants did not occur primarily in Massachusetts and that the trial judge allowed prejudicially erroneous jury...
Business Litigation Blog
Supreme Court Holds That An Employee Challenging a Job Transfer Under Title VII Need Not Show Significant Harm
In Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, the United States Supreme Court held that an employee challenging a job transfer under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 must show that the transfer brought about “some harm” with respect to an identifiable term or...
LLCs and Other Unincorporated Associations Present Challenges for Federal Diversity Jurisdiction
Unincorporated associations, such as LLCs, present particular challenges for establishing federal diversity jurisdiction. In BRT Management LLC v. Malden Storage LLC, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit recently reversed a District Court judgment...
Adopting a permissive view of the long-arm statute, SJC holds Massachusetts has jurisdiction over Michigan car manufacturer
On June 8, Massachusetts’ highest court, the Supreme Judicial Court, held that a Massachusetts court had the authority (jurisdiction) to consider a case involving an out-of-state car manufacturer who sold cars in the Commonwealth. The case, Doucet v. FCA US LLC,...
Employer Cannot Reform or Rescind Employment Contract in Which Employee Mistakenly Entitled to Hundreds of Thousands of Dollars Monthly
The importance of careful contract review and communication with counsel were recently highlighted in the case of Dahua Technology USA Inc. v. Feng Zhang, in which the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts denied an employer’s attempt to...
Supreme Judicial Court Finds Attorneys’ Fees Are Not Damages
Where an insurance policy provides coverage for damages because of, e.g., bodily injury, property damage, or advertising injury, does that insurance policy cover attorneys’ fees awarded as a result of a covered claim? The Supreme Judicial Court has just said that it...
Supreme Judicial Court Concludes That Anti-SLAPP Statute Does Not Apply to Civil Enforcement Actions By the Attorney General
In a recent decision, affirming the Superior Court, the Supreme Judicial Court concluded that civil enforcement actions filed by the Attorney General are not subject to the constraints of G. L. c. 213, § 59H, also known as the anti-SLAPP statute. In Commonwealth v....
Court Addresses Attorney Gender Pay Gap in Attorneys’ Fee Award Decision
In a recent decision awarding attorneys’ fees, a U.S. District Court in Pennsylvania explicitly considered the historic attorney gender pay gap. In that case – Ray v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC – the plaintiff, Alison Ray, sought a total of $847,945 in attorneys’...
OSHA Drops Its Vaccine Mandate for Large Businesses
Last week, in a statement and a notice of withdrawal, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) officially withdrew its emergency temporary standard (“ETS”) that required large employers, with 100 or more employees, to implement COVID-19 vaccination...
District of Massachusetts Holds Text Messages Between Plaintiffs and Third-Parties Not Protected from Discovery as Concerted Activities
The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts has held that group text messages between plaintiffs and third parties are not protected from disclosure in discovery as “concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual...
Sign up to the Fitch briefs
Fitch Law Partners LLP reports news and insights on complex litigation topics. Clients, colleagues and friends may receive The Fitch Briefs by signing up here.